Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance

Date d’inscription	3 avril 2025
Numéro de l’enjeu	25-033-DRV
Nom	Billy Cutshall
Organisme	THP/MC+
Adresse	PO BOX 186FALL BRANCH, TN, 37745United StatesVoir sur la carte (s’ouvre dans un nouvel onglet)
Téléphone	615-815-6601
Courriel	[email protected]
Comité	Comité de contrôle de la circulation routière
État	Fermé
Résumé de l’enjeu	Code supprimé de Safespect.
Justification ou besoin	Le code 376.11D1 a été retiré du programme Safespect. Comment doit-on consigner cette infraction ? Plusieurs entreprises possèdent un classeur contenant différents numéros USDOT et identifiants d'entreprise. Lorsqu'on contrôle une entreprise signalée hors service par la FMCSA, elle choisit simplement un numéro d'entreprise dans le classeur et le colle sur le véhicule, la plupart du temps pendant l'inspection. De plus, elle ne possède jamais le bail requis. Bien qu'elle ne soit pas concernée par la réglementation 390.21 relative aux camions de location, elle est en infraction manifeste. Sans ces baux, elle peut prétendre travailler pour n'importe quelle entreprise et nous ne pouvons pas le prouver. Merci.
Demande d’action	Veuillez rétablir la configuration 376.11D1 dans safespect. Merci.
Mesures prises par le comité	The committee recognizes the value of collecting data regarding carrier lease agreements for the purpose of conducting investigations and helping to establish reincarnated/chameleon carriers. There was concern raised by states that have not adopted Part 376 that the presence of this violation would negatively impact data quality. The committee discussed that training and accountability should be used to address data quality issues. The committee decided that adding § 376.11(d)(1) back to the violation code tables would provide a useful tool to states that can cite this violation when discovered. This was discussed at the board and the board thought it should be discussed in the Driver-Traffic Enforcement Committee. The issue was moved to be discussed there. Driver-Traffic Committee discussed the issue. It was explained that some states have not adopted Part 376, which could cause potential confusion. Only five states at the voting table stated they have adopted Part 376. It was asked whether anyone was having issues enforcing Part 376, specifically regarding this issue request. It was discussed that this could be a good tool for roadside inspection, but the regulation, as written, could validate roadside enforcement. It was referenced that Part 376 is not taught during Part A training. No further discussion ensued and the issue was closed.

Date d’inscription

3 avril 2025

Numéro de l’enjeu

25-033-DRV

Nom

Billy Cutshall

Organisme

THP/MC+

Adresse

PO BOX 186FALL BRANCH, TN, 37745United StatesVoir sur la carte

Téléphone

615-815-6601

Courriel

[email protected]

Comité

Comité de contrôle de la circulation routière

État

Fermé

Résumé de l’enjeu

Code supprimé de Safespect.

Justification ou besoin

Le code 376.11D1 a été retiré du programme Safespect. Comment doit-on consigner cette infraction ? Plusieurs entreprises possèdent un classeur contenant différents numéros USDOT et identifiants d'entreprise. Lorsqu'on contrôle une entreprise signalée hors service par la FMCSA, elle choisit simplement un numéro d'entreprise dans le classeur et le colle sur le véhicule, la plupart du temps pendant l'inspection. De plus, elle ne possède jamais le bail requis. Bien qu'elle ne soit pas concernée par la réglementation 390.21 relative aux camions de location, elle est en infraction manifeste. Sans ces baux, elle peut prétendre travailler pour n'importe quelle entreprise et nous ne pouvons pas le prouver. Merci.

Demande d’action

Veuillez rétablir la configuration 376.11D1 dans safespect. Merci.

Mesures prises par le comité

The committee recognizes the value of collecting data regarding carrier lease agreements for the purpose of conducting investigations and helping to establish reincarnated/chameleon carriers. There was concern raised by states that have not adopted Part 376 that the presence of this violation would negatively impact data quality. The committee discussed that training and accountability should be used to address data quality issues. The committee decided that adding § 376.11(d)(1) back to the violation code tables would provide a useful tool to states that can cite this violation when discovered. This was discussed at the board and the board thought it should be discussed in the Driver-Traffic Enforcement Committee. The issue was moved to be discussed there.

Driver-Traffic Committee discussed the issue. It was explained that some states have not adopted Part 376, which could cause potential confusion. Only five states at the voting table stated they have adopted Part 376. It was asked whether anyone was having issues enforcing Part 376, specifically regarding this issue request. It was discussed that this could be a good tool for roadside inspection, but the regulation, as written, could validate roadside enforcement. It was referenced that Part 376 is not taught during Part A training. No further discussion ensued and the issue was closed.

Code SafeSpect 376.11D1