Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance

Fecha de registro	3 de abril de 2025
Número de asunto	25-033-DRV
Nombre	Billy Cutshall
Agencia	THP/MC+
Dirección	PO BOX 186FALL BRANCH, TN, 37745United StatesVer en el mapa (se abre en una pestaña nueva)
Teléfono	615-815-6601
Correo electrónico	[email protected]
Comité	Comité de Control de Tráfico y Conductores
Estado	Cerrado
Resumen del asunto	Código eliminado de Safespect.
Justificación o necesidad	El código 376.11D1 se ha eliminado del programa Safespect. ¿Cómo registramos la infracción? Hemos tenido varias empresas que llevan una carpeta llena de diferentes números USDOT e identificaciones de empresas. Cuando detenemos una que ha sido declarada fuera de servicio por la FMCSA, simplemente toman otra empresa de la carpeta y la pegan al vehículo, generalmente durante el proceso de inspección. Luego, nunca tienen el contrato de arrendamiento requerido. No están sujetos a las regulaciones de camiones de alquiler 390.21, pero están cometiendo una clara infracción. Sin tener que llevar estos contratos de arrendamiento, pueden afirmar que trabajan para cualquier empresa y no podemos probar lo contrario. Gracias.
Solicitud de acción	Por favor, restablezcan la norma 376.11D1 para Safespect. Gracias.
Medidas adoptadas por el comité	The committee recognizes the value of collecting data regarding carrier lease agreements for the purpose of conducting investigations and helping to establish reincarnated/chameleon carriers. There was concern raised by states that have not adopted Part 376 that the presence of this violation would negatively impact data quality. The committee discussed that training and accountability should be used to address data quality issues. The committee decided that adding § 376.11(d)(1) back to the violation code tables would provide a useful tool to states that can cite this violation when discovered. This was discussed at the board and the board thought it should be discussed in the Driver-Traffic Enforcement Committee. The issue was moved to be discussed there. Driver-Traffic Committee discussed the issue. It was explained that some states have not adopted Part 376, which could cause potential confusion. Only five states at the voting table stated they have adopted Part 376. It was asked whether anyone was having issues enforcing Part 376, specifically regarding this issue request. It was discussed that this could be a good tool for roadside inspection, but the regulation, as written, could validate roadside enforcement. It was referenced that Part 376 is not taught during Part A training. No further discussion ensued and the issue was closed.

Fecha de registro

3 de abril de 2025

Número de asunto

25-033-DRV

Nombre

Billy Cutshall

Agencia

THP/MC+

Dirección

PO BOX 186FALL BRANCH, TN, 37745United StatesVer en el mapa

Teléfono

615-815-6601

Correo electrónico

[email protected]

Comité

Comité de Control de Tráfico y Conductores

Estado

Cerrado

Resumen del asunto

Código eliminado de Safespect.

Justificación o necesidad

El código 376.11D1 se ha eliminado del programa Safespect. ¿Cómo registramos la infracción? Hemos tenido varias empresas que llevan una carpeta llena de diferentes números USDOT e identificaciones de empresas. Cuando detenemos una que ha sido declarada fuera de servicio por la FMCSA, simplemente toman otra empresa de la carpeta y la pegan al vehículo, generalmente durante el proceso de inspección. Luego, nunca tienen el contrato de arrendamiento requerido. No están sujetos a las regulaciones de camiones de alquiler 390.21, pero están cometiendo una clara infracción. Sin tener que llevar estos contratos de arrendamiento, pueden afirmar que trabajan para cualquier empresa y no podemos probar lo contrario. Gracias.

Solicitud de acción

Por favor, restablezcan la norma 376.11D1 para Safespect. Gracias.

Medidas adoptadas por el comité

The committee recognizes the value of collecting data regarding carrier lease agreements for the purpose of conducting investigations and helping to establish reincarnated/chameleon carriers. There was concern raised by states that have not adopted Part 376 that the presence of this violation would negatively impact data quality. The committee discussed that training and accountability should be used to address data quality issues. The committee decided that adding § 376.11(d)(1) back to the violation code tables would provide a useful tool to states that can cite this violation when discovered. This was discussed at the board and the board thought it should be discussed in the Driver-Traffic Enforcement Committee. The issue was moved to be discussed there.

Driver-Traffic Committee discussed the issue. It was explained that some states have not adopted Part 376, which could cause potential confusion. Only five states at the voting table stated they have adopted Part 376. It was asked whether anyone was having issues enforcing Part 376, specifically regarding this issue request. It was discussed that this could be a good tool for roadside inspection, but the regulation, as written, could validate roadside enforcement. It was referenced that Part 376 is not taught during Part A training. No further discussion ensued and the issue was closed.

Código SafeSpect 376.11D1