Conjuntos de barras estabilizadoras en autobuses
| Fecha de registro | 23 de abril de 2001 |
|---|---|
| Número de asunto | 01-006-VEH |
| Nombre | Dean Harbour |
| Agencia | Virginia State Police |
| Dirección | VirginiaUnited StatesVer en el mapa (se abre en una pestaña nueva) |
| Comité | Comité de Vehículos |
| Estado | Cerrado |
| Resumen del asunto | ¿La barra estabilizadora es un componente de la suspensión y debe colocarse fuera de servicio si está suelta o rota? |
| Justificación o necesidad | Si el enlace de la barra estabilizadora está roto, falta o está desgastado, ¿alguna de estas condiciones cumpliría la condición OOS según 9.d. para el par, el radio y otros componentes de seguimiento? |
| Solicitud de acción | Orientación y posible OOSC. |
| Medidas adoptadas por el comité | The Vehicle Committee discussed the issue concerning the anti-sway bar. It was agreed the anti-sway bar was not a suspension component in the traditional sense because the axle can stay in place and the tires are held to the road surface without an anti-sway bar. However, if there were a failure of an end fastener that allowed the end of the anti-sway bar to hang free and possibly come in contact with a tire, that would create an imminent hazard. The inspector must judge each situation independently to determine if an imminently hazardous condition exists. If the free end were judged likely to impact a tire or other such component an imminently hazardous condition would exist and the vehicle should be placed out of service. If the "free" end were judged not likely to impact a tire or other component it would not be constitute an imminently hazardous condition and should not be placed out of service. |