Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance

Date d’inscription	15 mars 2019
Numéro de l’enjeu	19-014-VEH
Nom	Kirk Sander
Organisme	National Waste and Recycling Association
Adresse	1550 Crystal DrSuite 804Arlington, VA, 22202United StatesVoir sur la carte (s’ouvre dans un nouvel onglet)
Téléphone	2023643750
Courriel	[email protected]
Comité	Comité des véhicules
État	Fermé
Résumé de l’enjeu	Dans de nombreuses régions, les contrôles routiers ont immobilisé des transporteurs en raison de problèmes d'arrimage du chargement. Certains camions de transport de marchandises sont équipés de goupilles de basculement/vidange à commande hydraulique sur leur châssis. Certaines unités de contrôle des véhicules commerciaux acceptent l'utilisation de ces goupilles. Pour ceux qui n’ont pas l’autorisation d’utiliser les goupilles ou qui n’ont pas de goupilles sur leurs véhicules, le comité ANSI Z245-1 a désigné un sous-groupe pour élaborer une solution de sécurisation des conteneurs. Le sous-groupe était composé d'au moins trois fabricants de semi-remorques, de fabricants de conteneurs et de nombreux autres représentants des services de sécurité, de conformité et d'exploitation des propriétaires et utilisateurs de semi-remorques. Un projet de document a été présenté lors de la dernière réunion du comité ANSI Z245-1 sur les équipements mobiles, le 18 février 2019. Le sous-comité Z245-1 a finalisé le document en vue d'un vote final d'acceptation par la Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration et la Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance.
Justification ou besoin	L'application et la compréhension des règles relatives à l'arrimage correct d'un camion à benne sont incohérentes.
Demande d’action	La National Waste and Recycling Association et l'Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc. demandent à la Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance et à la FMCSA d'examiner la méthode de fixation ci-jointe comme solution d'atténuation pour une fixation appropriée.
Mesures prises par le comité	The virtual meeting discussion began with Commodore Hall representing ISRE giving a presentation on the testing that was done in Wisconsin with the use of the hydraulic lift pins and chains. The testing results were presented to Vehicle Committee. Karl Mittlestadt from Wisconsin State Police was present during the testing and both Karl and Luke Loy from FMCSA reported out to the committee that they accepted that the testing met the equivalent means for the U.S. in 393.102. Currently, no commodity regulation specific to lugger trucks in comparison to roll-on roll-off trucks. By their design, the hoist on luggers provides container securement. Have done testing for 45 months to determine securement sufficiency. Under 393.102, they have met the equivalent means of securement. Performed, on site testing 07/29/20 and 8/18/20 with manufacturers, Wisconsin state patrol, associations, and motor carriers. Did rear acceleration 5g test, lateral securement 5g test, and forward securement 8g tests, option 1 and option 2. An engineering study was conducted for ACE Brothers and provided to Vehicle Committee. Question from Canadian member whether testing was done on downward force as Canada requires 2g and also whether there was testing for maneuverability and stability. Answer, the pins do not provide downward pressure. No performance testing was done on stability. Canada was not prepared to accept the equivalent means in Canada, so the bulletin was amended to ensure that the equivalent means information on pages 7 and 8 currently, only apply to the U.S. Because lugger containers are not in the commodity specific US rules it must be secured under the general provisions. Lugger containers was added into the Roll on Roll off container inspection bulletin and shown to committee for consideration. Discussion on different options and explanation of all of the additions into the inspection bulletin. Discussion that there was minimal movement, but it was not enough movement to affect maneuverability or stability. The bulletin that was done last year had the tie downs for lugger boxes. That is still an option, but with the testing possibly add more information into the bulletin for other options of tiedowns that meet the equivalent means. Canada not ready at this point to accept the alternate means. Will have wording reflect that it is US options only. There were two options of bulletins presented to provide two different ways of explaining the information and the committee unanimously voted on the second option. Motion passed unanimously, no abstentions, Item closed. Bulletin will be sent to Training committee to see if they would like any videos to go with the bulletin.
Documents à l’appui	Figure-3-Hold-Down.pdf (s’ouvre dans un nouvel onglet) Figure-2-Lugger-Tie-Down-Strap-to-Top-of-Box.pdf (s’ouvre dans un nouvel onglet) Figure-1-Lugger-Pocket-and-Strap.pdf (s’ouvre dans un nouvel onglet) ANSI-Lugger-securement-DRAFT-19-3-7.pdf (s’ouvre dans un nouvel onglet)

Date d’inscription

15 mars 2019

Numéro de l’enjeu

19-014-VEH

Nom

Kirk Sander

Organisme

National Waste and Recycling Association

Adresse

1550 Crystal DrSuite 804Arlington, VA, 22202United StatesVoir sur la carte

Téléphone

2023643750

Courriel

[email protected]

Comité

Comité des véhicules

État

Fermé

Résumé de l’enjeu

Dans de nombreuses régions, les contrôles routiers ont immobilisé des transporteurs en raison de problèmes d'arrimage du chargement. Certains camions de transport de marchandises sont équipés de goupilles de basculement/vidange à commande hydraulique sur leur châssis. Certaines unités de contrôle des véhicules commerciaux acceptent l'utilisation de ces goupilles. Pour ceux qui n’ont pas l’autorisation d’utiliser les goupilles ou qui n’ont pas de goupilles sur leurs véhicules, le comité ANSI Z245-1 a désigné un sous-groupe pour élaborer une solution de sécurisation des conteneurs. Le sous-groupe était composé d'au moins trois fabricants de semi-remorques, de fabricants de conteneurs et de nombreux autres représentants des services de sécurité, de conformité et d'exploitation des propriétaires et utilisateurs de semi-remorques. Un projet de document a été présenté lors de la dernière réunion du comité ANSI Z245-1 sur les équipements mobiles, le 18 février 2019. Le sous-comité Z245-1 a finalisé le document en vue d'un vote final d'acceptation par la Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration et la Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance.

Justification ou besoin

L'application et la compréhension des règles relatives à l'arrimage correct d'un camion à benne sont incohérentes.

Demande d’action

La National Waste and Recycling Association et l'Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc. demandent à la Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance et à la FMCSA d'examiner la méthode de fixation ci-jointe comme solution d'atténuation pour une fixation appropriée.

Mesures prises par le comité

The virtual meeting discussion began with Commodore Hall representing ISRE giving a presentation on the testing that was done in Wisconsin with the use of the hydraulic lift pins and chains. The testing results were presented to Vehicle Committee. Karl Mittlestadt from Wisconsin State Police was present during the testing and both Karl and Luke Loy from FMCSA reported out to the committee that they accepted that the testing met the equivalent means for the U.S. in 393.102. Currently, no commodity regulation specific to lugger trucks in comparison to roll-on roll-off trucks. By their design, the hoist on luggers provides container securement. Have done testing for 45 months to determine securement sufficiency. Under 393.102, they have met the equivalent means of securement. Performed, on site testing 07/29/20 and 8/18/20 with manufacturers, Wisconsin state patrol, associations, and motor carriers. Did rear acceleration 5g test, lateral securement 5g test, and forward securement 8g tests, option 1 and option 2. An engineering study was conducted for ACE Brothers and provided to Vehicle Committee.

Question from Canadian member whether testing was done on downward force as Canada requires 2g and also whether there was testing for maneuverability and stability. Answer, the pins do not provide downward pressure. No performance testing was done on stability. Canada was not prepared to accept the equivalent means in Canada, so the bulletin was amended to ensure that the equivalent means information on pages 7 and 8 currently, only apply to the U.S.

Because lugger containers are not in the commodity specific US rules it must be secured under the general provisions. Lugger containers was added into the Roll on Roll off container inspection bulletin and shown to committee for consideration. Discussion on different options and explanation of all of the additions into the inspection bulletin. Discussion that there was minimal movement, but it was not enough movement to affect maneuverability or stability. The bulletin that was done last year had the tie downs for lugger boxes. That is still an option, but with the testing possibly add more information into the bulletin for other options of tiedowns that meet the equivalent means. Canada not ready at this point to accept the alternate means. Will have wording reflect that it is US options only.

There were two options of bulletins presented to provide two different ways of explaining the information and the committee unanimously voted on the second option. Motion passed unanimously, no abstentions, Item closed. Bulletin will be sent to Training committee to see if they would like any videos to go with the bulletin.

Documents à l’appui

OOSC, Partie II, Article 2. arrimage des charges - Caisses Lugger