Saltar al contenido principal

OOSC, Parte II, Artículo 4. Tren de transmisión/Eje de transmisión, b. - Perno de retención faltante o suelto

Fecha de registro26 de marzo de 2016
Número de asunto16-015-VEH
NombreTom Forbes
AgenciaThe Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Dirección180 East Broad StreetColumbus, Ohio, 43215United StatesVer en el mapa (se abre en una pestaña nueva)
Teléfono614-519-2811
Correo electrónico[email protected]
ComitéComité de Vehículos
EstadoCerrado
Resumen del asunto

Un inspector de Ohio detuvo un vehículo comercial para una inspección y descubrió que faltaba un perno de retención en la junta universal. El Código de Vehículos de Ohio (OOSC) aborda los pernos de la tapa del cojinete en la sección 4.b.(3) cuando están sueltos o faltan, pero no trata los pernos de retención. Se adjuntan fotografías para mostrar la diferencia entre un perno de la tapa del cojinete y un perno de retención.

Justificación o necesidad

Importante.

Solicitud de acción

¿Debe añadirse al OOSC un perno de retención que falte o esté suelto en la junta universal?

Medidas adoptadas por el comité

The picture under universal joint in the OOSC identifies the retainer bolt but it is not included in the description of an OOS violation. Several members of the Vehicle Committee, that were associated with the creation of the driveline/driveshaft section, thought that retainer bolt was already in the description. It was determined that it was an oversight since the picture already identifies the retainer bolt and the intent was to have a missing, broken, or loose retainer bolt as an OOS violation.

A further discussion was regarding the “with hand pressure only” and whether it should also be removed from subparagraph 3. It was stated that the retainer bolt and the bearing cap bolt are both installed with thread locking material. This can, and has, resulted in these fasteners being loose showing a portion of the threads, while the inspector cannot physically turn the fastener with hand pressure. Several pictures were shown of this condition where nuts are significantly backed off, but the nut cannot be turned. Under the current wording, these loose fasteners would not meet the OOSC. Discussion took place around what “loose” standard should be used. Committee members decided, for uniformity purposes, that this condition should be treated as any other fastener in the OOSC criteria (i.e.: Wheel fasteners, U-bolts, fifth wheel fasteners, etc.), and should not be based on hand pressure. The Vehicle Committee unanimously approved to add “or retainer bolt” and remove “with hand pressure only” from subparagraph 3. b. Universal Joint (3) Any missing, broken, or loose universal joint bearing cap bolt or retainer bolt.

Documentos de respaldo